It has been an interesting and fulfilling trip doing this All Books Project. Besides seeing first hand some of the issues related to user interface design, application optimization, content availability, and general usability (UX), I’m just enjoying some of the impressions that come from those I’m able to speak with about this trip towards a different (better?) approach to Biblical literacy.
For example, a few weeks ago while connecting with a brother, I mentioned the All Books Project as one of the new things happening since he and I last sat together. I pulled out my mobile to show him what it was and he was genuinely impressed. I explained to him that building this is challenging me to take just having a Bible on my mobile beyond simply having the text with me to being able to make it relevant. So then questions and discussion about design decisions, the amount of books, and even the choice of translation became part of the “reading” experience that I’m cultivating in this. It got me thinking a bit more about that point made a few times about Biblical literacy being this ability to not just read the Bible, but create it.
A mobile Bible reading application motivating you to create the Bible, not just read it? Yup. Let me dive a bit more.
Its already understood by all of us that when we read, listen to, or watch something that we are engaging within this process of consuming it. But here’s the rub when it comes to the Bible and the general function of faith-texts, we’ve got to expel something. Now, hopefully, its a good thing we are putting out there, but sometimes the case is that no matter what we are putting in, what comes out doesn’t look/sound/taste so great (Matthew 15:11).
So, we get out communities to this place now with mobile where they are eating on the right things. We’ve got them with Bibles on their devices, and some of us have even pushed to using small group or community reading plans to encourage some deeper reading behaviors (contemplation, discussion, etc.). But then what? What’s next after they have read it? How do we broach that piece about understanding and wisdom (Proverbs 4:7)? And even more than understanding, what does it look like when what’s being read, contemplated, and discussed becomes relevant?
Thing is, I can answer those if I’m looking at faith and faith development through our familiar cultural lenses (faith produces works which validate faith, preaches a Gospel that saves, entreats a Gospel that advocates justice and mercy, etc). But, when I’m sitting with my friend, and he’s asking a similar question, how he can take what it is that he’s most passionate about and turn that into a “version of the Bible?” I’m sometimes sitting looking at this mobile and say – “is consumption of this all that this tool is able to do?”
There’s probably a “no” to that. I mean really, we can look at John 4:1-42 and say that its more than simply having a behavior and tools that makes faith demonstrated equal to faith lived. But, with mobile (mobile ministry), where to we start to see faith lived as being the validation to this channel, window, magic wand, opportunity? Or, is it only worth for being a channel to be broadcast to then consumed.
Which would be a shame if you think about it. Just because you eat three meals a day doesn’t mean that you eat healthy. Can mobile ministry be more than a meal substitute? Does it provoke digestion and nutrition beyond simply taking it in?
What Do You Understand About This Space
Wednesday, April 25th, 2012I asked at a meeting with several internet ministries last year if there was a methodology to their behaviors/intentions to use the web as a connection point for evangelism and discipleship. I was concerned in many respects, because while I was listening to a group of people passionate about sharing the fruits of their faith, I heard very little about understanding the implications of being in this space. This magazine takes the posture of bearing to understand the implications of mobile before and during sharing the passions that make mobile a suitable addition to the toolkit of ministers and developers alike. To that end, we poke a ton – its unique and then some. And then… its not all that unique at all:
Read the rest of In the Battles of SOPA and PIPA, Who Should Control the Internet at Vanity Fair
What do you get about this level of access, security, connectivity, and affordance? Do you understand that content isn’t king, the person who designs the user experience is king – and you are simply a steward of one part of the field? Are you concerned about DNS activities? Or, does your mobile lifestyle begin and end with those communications which happen without the facilitation of global cables, interested governments, and occasional support of standards bodies?
Nothing about tweeting a post embeds compassion, justice, or even the hope of the Gospel into the Internet. That only comes when that tweet intersects with the personal reality of the person reading it. Its relevant (and therefore points to salvation) when its personal. Nothing more, nothing less. This isn’t a magic hat. Nor is it the best thing since sliced bread (though, you can argue that there are probably more mobiles than sliced bread in the hands of folks and that might be near-correct). What do you understand about the implications of telling people to go see announcements on Facebook – when you are also not teaching them about Facebook (or Internet) addiction? The two go hand in hand in terms of lessons – as well as hand in hand in terms of how you lean on these communication technologies for the prosperity of those reading/listening/watching.
Do you need to understand everything about how the Internet and mobile works in order to do ministry? No. Should you know as much as possible about the implications of it not working for whatever reason – whether you can solve it or not? Yes. And its to that end we exist in this space… its not that unique at all, just an acknowledgement of something different amongst the hype of the moment.
Tags: Anonymous, hacking, mobile in spiritual/theological/psychological, PIPA, SOPA, understanding, Vanity Fair, wisdom
Posted in Commentary | No Comments »