Mobile Ministry Magazine (MMM)

Posts Tagged ‘spiritual implications’

Speak Unto That Object: Be Thou Computer

Wednesday, March 28th, 2012

Was speaking with my friend about an post that I’d done on my personal blog at the beginning of the year, and to contextualize things, I used the following Scripture (Mark 11:12-26):

…And on the morrow, when they were come from Bethany, he was hungry: And seeing a fig tree afar off having leaves, he came, if haply he might find any thing thereon: and when he came to it, he found nothing but leaves; for the time of figs was not yet. And Jesus answered and said unto it, “No man eat fruit of thee hereafter for ever.” And his disciples heard it.

And they come to Jerusalem: and Jesus went into the temple, and began to cast out them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves; And would not suffer that any man should carry any vessel through the temple. And he taught, saying unto them, “Is it not written, My house shall be called of all nations the house of prayer? but ye have made it a den of thieves.” And the scribes and chief priests heard it, and sought how they might destroy him: for they feared him, because all the people was astonished at his doctrine.

And when even was come, he went out of the city. And in the morning, as they passed by, they saw the fig tree dried up from the roots. And Peter calling to remembrance saith unto him, Master, behold, the fig tree which thou cursedst is withered away.

And Jesus answering saith unto them, “Have faith in God. For verily I say unto you, That whosoever shall say unto this mountain, Be thou removed, and be thou cast into the sea; and shall not doubt in his heart, but shall believe that those things which he saith shall come to pass; he shall have whatsoever he saith. Therefore I say unto you, What things soever ye desire, when ye pray, believe that ye receive them, and ye shall have them. And when ye stand praying, forgive, if ye have ought against any: that your Father also which is in heaven may forgive you your trespasses. But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses.”

When I was a member of a particular church community in PA, they would use this Scripture often as a jumping off point to the power that a believer has to activate their fatih my speaking, believing, and acting. While I’ve got my own quibbles about the doctrines of “word-faith” approaches, I can appreciate the attention to the creative and instigative ability that God Himself used when taking objects that had no form, and after speaking, they became all that we know of as the earth and all that’s wihtin it (Genesis 1).

That article on my personal blog was about a similar approach to computing being taken on by Alvaro Cassinelli and Alexis Zerroug called invoked computing. You can think of this simply as invoking a specific context of computing to an object that might not by its nature have any computing ability. Invoked computing comes from taking the characteristics of a multi-modal, spatial augmented reality, and grafting it into a system which changes objects into (computational) communication devices. Here’s a snippet of their interview at The Guardian:

…In the invoked computing scenario, the object itself works as an “invocation” trigger and supports interactivity. We naturally looked for trigger-objects that are more or less pervasive in the real world, hence food-related items (the banana and pizza box). As triggers, they operate in ways similar to icons in a computer operating system: these are not the applications themselves, but keys to open them, to invoke them. On the other hand, real physical objects become the support for the interaction, provide surfaces on which to project images or sound.

So, in effect, you’re turning everyday objects into touchscreens?

Not exactly. The invoked computing project proposes systems to project “function” on real objects, but without making the interactive space resemble a screen with icons. Indeed, we are not trying to project icons or conventional representations of computer applications into the real world that when touched will launch a particular computing routine. Instead, affordances in the physical world itself should suggest and trigger function – even new, improvised functions….

Read the rest of You Really Can Use A Banana As A Telephone at The Guardian

This idea of invoked computing goes a good bit beyond mobile, and even further than simply “a computer for everyone and everyone with the ability to access whatever a computer terminal offers.” Inovked computing is about literally speaking and utilizing the activity of computers (linking, computation, creation, and communication) on objects which would not be normally associated with computing.

We can see this in part today with some of the USB items that you’d catch in a swag bag (USB bracelets that also tell time, or a rock that’s also a memory key). This goes a good bit further though. Invoked computing asks us to consider a reality where what we need from a computer is as close as what we speak out of our mouth. With such a reality, would we speak life and death as Jesus did with the fig tree, or would we move a mountain out of the way of someone else’s life so that they could see the path they were intended to travel a bit clearer?

What we do in mobile with Siri, Google Voice Commands, Vriingo, and such is going down this road. What kind of faith are we teaching people to have for their lives when more than just a question can be answered or a text sent is the result? What happens when we provoke a different kind of reallity into objects than what was originally designed?

~ video via Wired Magazine and DigiInfo.TV

 

How Has Tech Changed Ministry for You

Sunday, March 25th, 2012

We usually have something along the lines of the thinking piece for Sundays since many people are attending service and have their local communities on their hearts and minds. And so with that in frame, we’d just want to continue that with a simple question about computer tech and its appearance within faith communities:

How has the use of mobile and social technologies influenced or changed your perceptions of ministry?

Place your answers in the comments.

 

Research Publishing Tracking Evolution of (Digital) Tech within Faith Communities

Thursday, March 22nd, 2012

At the time of this writing, I’d not taking a deep look into the survey, but I do think that its on course for being good for reflection (an investigation of the methodology and research process would answer any questions of value beyond what’s been published). From Church Mag:

…As of 2010, the percentage of churches that had no web or Facebook presence was 24%. Perhaps I shouldn’t be too shocked by this number. Considering how only an estimated 78% of the North American population uses the internet, maybe it should be expected that roughly the same amount, 76% of American congregations, have an internet presence. But then I have to ask, who is using the internet? The population of North America is roughly 350 million. As of 2011, it was estimated that about 272 million were using the internet. I may be wrong in this assumption, but my guess is that the majority of ‘non-internet users’ are either infants or elders. The percentage of the population under 15 years old is roughly 19%; the percentage over 65 is roughly 13%. (I realize that children, especially going into their teenage years, are on the internet quite a bit; however, statistically speaking, this gives us a good estimate for comparing usage vs. necessity of usage.)  If we only consider the percentage of 16 – 64 year olds who are using the internet, the age range with whom most churches try to connect, the percentage of this population who are online definitely increase from the overall population estimation of 78%…

 

Mobile Industry Review and the Emporia Telecom Series

Wednesday, March 21st, 2012

For a number of weeks now, Mobile Industry Review has been doing a series with Emporia Telecom, a company whose mobile offerings are designed around the needs of those persons who might be older or have needs for simpler and easier to undestand mobile devices. I hesitate to pigeon-hole their offerings into something just for an older audience, because everyone can do with better designed user interfaces, attention to detail/behavior, and such. But, their focus on this group is notable, specifically because it seems to follow along the lines of what we were getting at with our 4th resolution, intentional design decisions and UIs/UXs which follow mobile perspectives.

The Mobile Industry Review series has about six videos (at the time of writing) already published. I’d encourage you to take a look at them:

While watching these videos, or after watching them, consider these points in view of what you are planning or doing in respect to mobile ministry:

  • Does your application or service not just include smartphone and non-smartphone users, but the various ranges of age groups within each?
  • How does your application or service scale to age groups where information is consumed and retained in a different bucket than a UI guide’s recommended “lines per screen?”
  • How do you track or model healthier communication behaviors across age/demographic groups?

A step perhaps towards addressing that resolution by seeing the wisdom of designing for those who carry the most wisdom in many of our communities.

 

Technology Ratchets

Tuesday, March 6th, 2012

This might be a bit off the normal stream of topic, but given the posts framing around the Lutheran branch of Christianity, and then glue and sticks (can you see the connection) already posted this week, might as well throw something of a ratchet into things:

…Which all makes me wonder: Are we are destined to hit a point where our global intellectual capacity is so taken up with maintaining the technological status quo, that we will loose the capacity for further technological innovation?  Or even worse; are we heading for a technology innovation impasse ends up degenerating into an uncertain and unenlightened future?

I have to say, I’m not an optimist here – that is, unless we learn how to build effective technology ratchets.

A mechanical ratchet, as everyone knows, is a device that allows movement in one direction only. By comparison, a technology ratchet can be considered as something that allows technology development to move forward, but prevents or inhibits it from moving backward.  The idea is to find ways to hold onto ground gained through technology innovation, without having to constantly expend huge amounts of effort in doing so…

Read the rest of Why We Need Technology Ratchets at 2020 Science.

Truth be told, I sometimes feel MMM serves as a ratchet for some of you. Personally, there have been things done (living mobile, using a mobile web server, etc.) that have certainly felt a lot like this tech has indeed been a ratchet. For example, when’s the last time you heard us write on the topic of being “mobile only?” Saw Mobility Nigeria blogging about their experiences doing so and it kind kind of strikes me as a bit interesting that since going mobile-only (some background on that), we’ve not really turned back. In fact, anytime I’m asked to use a laptop these days (virtual conferencing and Visio/PowerPoint preferences), I get very aggitated and want to take an axe to the person(s) requesting such (antiquated to me) tools and behaviors. Similar feelings simmer when someone asks “hey, can you print from that iPad?” And I’m having to quickly process (see James 3) on finding their context of why they see printing as necessary. Its honestly that difficult to go back to a context of computing that I’ve gone away from.

Have any of you felt the same way? Perhaps in regards to when you first started replying to your office or family using mobile email and the resulting “crackbettery addict” conversation? Or, maybe it was you doing something so daring as bringinng a PDA/mobile to church and using that for Bible reading, then looking around at those with print Bibles and wondering why they insist on squinting at that 2in stack of paper? Or, whatever it was. There is some sense of technologies and behaviors adjusting or resetting our state of “normal” and now we move forward, or try to, in the midst of a greater community that’s slow to get the message.

Perhaps it wasn’t so off the stream of our topics afterall?

 

Where Is Your View on Mobile

Monday, February 13th, 2012

We get statements often when talking about MMM that people just don’t look at mobile in this light, but that it’s one that now they have to consider. You can’t blame this approach, much of our time is spent amongst people who live in such a way that faith and ethics plays an active role into most areas of their lives. That said, organizations always move slower than individuals, and so making a perception change on that level is a bit harder to broker. Then again, we do have folks like Tomi Ahonen, who tends to speak right to the heart of the matter for organizations:

…Despite the growing prevalence of mobile devices, Ahonen warns that the future isn’t going to be about mobile only, but about its role in cross-platform interactions. He says television, radio and other media won’t die, but that mobile will continue to grow as a complementary media channel that does other things like payments.

“US jewellers Tiffany’s e-commerce website wasn’t optimised for mobile. After optimising it, sales grew 125% from the website,” says Ahonen. He says this proves there isn’t going to be “one Internet”.

“The PC Web needs to be PC-optimised, the mobile needs to be mobile-optimised.”

Ahonen says in Japan all websites are designed for mobile first and that it should be the same in Africa.

In another example of the potential of mobile, Ahonen says in China mobile newspapers have converted 39% of their readers to pay for MMS news headlines. “’Tomorrow’s headlines today’ is the selling point.” China Mobile has 40m paying users on SMS- and MMS-based twice-daily headline services of branded newspapers’ headlines…

Kind of blunt, and frankly speaking, probably a bit further out there than most want to plan and work towards. Still, the facts about mobile are clear, and the implications of such a change on several aspects of society just can’t be ignored. We either see mobile for what it is, and what it will be; or, we wither under it hoping for some other kind of savior to communications and opportunity to live this faith we espouse towards.

 

Always On

Wednesday, February 8th, 2012
A brand-new iPad!

A few days ago my friend Elmo (no, not the one one From Sesame Street) posted this article on Facebook about the power of Introversion.  It’s a thought-provoking piece and, coming from the Philippines, one which spoke to my friend about the nature of Western Civilization (particularly the USA).  The scales in this culture are set up for Extroverts to thrive, and Introverts to adapt.  It’s an astute point.  In fact the article actually quotes a pastor who believes that God isn’t pleased with him because he “likes spending time alone.”  That’s just twisted.

Read of the rest of Always On at Painfully Hopeful

 

Mobify empowers marketers and developers to create amazing mobile web experiences. Tap to learn more

Mobify