It the last weekend in January – when a number of churches on the East Cost of the USA have canceled services due to snow and ice that has blanketed the region. What follows are my thoughts on getting around the weather to continue the fellowship in the respect to biblical models and traditions.
Sitting on Twitter, I saw that my former church had canceled service due to the snow/icy conditions that hit Charlotte. This makes a lot of sense, and I’m pretty sure that many churches are doing the same, since the conditions don’t make it pleasant to drive safely.
However, I did have a question in respect to the sermon. Many people attend church for the sermon and the fellowship. Missing one of these for a Sunday usually isn’t a problem, but both of those present a bit of a challenge for many believers. And so I ended up tweeting the following (two messages):
Given the state of mobile/web, weather shouldn’t impact the ability to preach a message (tweet)? But weather can and does impact the ability to fellowship; how does the church create/use virtual ties when impacts happen (tweet)?
Now, Wellspring’s pastor did say that he would be recording and posting the sermon – and this is good. But the second question remains, how can we skillfully and appropriately use mobile/web technology in order to keep the ties of fellowship when weather or other conditions dictate otherwise?
I’ve got a few ideas:
- Skype or other type of video/conference call
- Sharing an iTunes/Pandora/last.fm/Spotfy/last.fm/etc. playlist at a certain time for “praise and worship,” – adding the element of an accompanying blog post on the church blog for those who’d like to post their prayers, “amens,” etc.
- (Nearly)-Live streaming of the small groups who are able to meet in the home for worship, fellowship, and prayer
Do any of you employ these methods when weather or some other circumstance interrupts the usual flow of fellowship/worship? And if so, what have been some of the positives and negatives of doing this?
Weather is indeed a limitation of fellowship in the traditional face-to-face sense. But, is the traditional means of fellowship strong enough to deny the versatility of the technology that’s now at our fingertips?
Note: I’m not specifically asking about a full internet church experience or internet church campus. I am speaking specifically towards using the mobile and web arenas when normal fellowship and worship methods are interrupted. When we speak on an internet church, we can start talking the fun stuff like location-displacement of elements of the fellowship – which is a good bit different when it happens on a continual basis.
Accountability After the Presentation
Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009If I had to rank my experiences of the Visual Story Network Summit, it would have to be one of the questions that I was asked after presenting:
At that moment, everything that I spoke in that presentation meant nothing, as I showed by that answer my clear selfishness towards tech over people.
For all of the adrenaline that I had going through me, feeling a lot like I did a horrible job – that question not only slapped me back to reality, but in so many respects, leveled the kind of accountability to mobile that I many times do not display at all.
Truly, I’ve thought about that question all weekend; and today when driving back and forth to/from the office, I picked up my mobile intending to SMS a few people, only to remember that for all that I have in my hands, the lives of others on the road are so much more important.
Christ asks us simply to give our lives for someone else. When we text while driving, we are being selfish; taking the inventory call that their lives matter less than our own. Totally convicted by that moment, I’m changed. I hope that in Christ’s stead, and as accountabilty for yourself and others around you, that you would consider putting down the mobile while driving as well.
Tags: accessiblity, SMS, tech, VSN
Posted in Commentary, Social Engagement | No Comments »